Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Comparison of two methods for evaluation of image quality of lumbar spine radiographs
Author(s): Anders Tingberg; Magnus Bath; Markus Hakansson; Joakim Medin; Michael Sandborg; Gudrun Alm-Carlsson; Sören Mattsson; Lars Gunnar Mansson
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

To evaluate the image quality of clinical radiographs with two different methods, and to find correlations between the two methods. Based on fifteen lumbar spine radiographs, two new sets of images were created. A hybrid image set was created by adding two distributions of artificial lesions to each original image. The image quality parameters spatial resolution and noise were manipulated and a total of 210 hybrid images were created. A set of 105 disease-free images was created by applying the same combinations of spatial resolution and noise to the original images. The hybrid images were evaluated with the free-response forced error experiment (FFE) and the normal images with visual grading analysis (VGA) by nine experienced radiologists. The VGA study showed that images with low noise are preferred over images with higher noise levels. The alteration of the MTF had a limited influence on the VGA score. For the FFE study the visibility of the lesions was independent of the spatial resolution and the noise level. In this study we found no correlation between the two methods, probably because the detectability of the artificial lesions was not influenced by the manipulations of noise level and resolution. Hence, the detection of lesions in lumbar spine radiography may not be a quantum-noise limited task. The results show the strength of the VGA technique in terms of detecting small changes in the two image quality parameters. The method is more robust and has a higher statistical power than the ROC related method and could therefore, in some cases, be more suitable for use in optimization studies.

Paper Details

Date Published: 4 May 2004
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 5372, Medical Imaging 2004: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, (4 May 2004); doi: 10.1117/12.534040
Show Author Affiliations
Anders Tingberg, Malmo Univ. Hospital (Sweden)
Magnus Bath, Sahlgrenska Univ. Hospital (Sweden)
Markus Hakansson, Sahlgrenska Univ. Hospital (Sweden)
Joakim Medin, Malmo Univ. Hospital (Sweden)
Michael Sandborg, Linkoping Univ. (Sweden)
Gudrun Alm-Carlsson, Linkoping Univ. (Sweden)
Sören Mattsson, Malmo Univ. Hospital (Sweden)
Lars Gunnar Mansson, Sahlgrenska Univ. Hospital (Sweden)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5372:
Medical Imaging 2004: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Dev P. Chakraborty; Miguel P. Eckstein, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top