Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Differences between mono- and poly-energetic spectra in modeling DQE(f)
Author(s): Robert M. Nishikawa
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Most theoretical calculations of DQE are done assuming a mono-energetic beam, whereas, clinically, the systems are used with poly-energetic spectra. Using a cascaded stochastic model of a mammographic imaging system, we compared results using mono-energetic beams to mammographic poly-energetic beams. The effects of the depth of x-ray interaction in the phosphor were explicitly included in the model. We calculated DQE, MTF and NPS as a function of spatial frequency and also calculated the Swank noise factor (AS) and quantum detection efficiency (AQ). For mono-energetic beams between 15 and 40 keV, the AS changed from 0.80 to 0.84, and the AQ decreased from 0.90 to 0.16. For the spatial-frequency dependent measures, at 10 cycles/mm, the MTF increased from 0.09 to 0.16, the ratio of MTF squared to the relative NPS increased from 0.13 to 0.29, and DQE decreased from 0.19 to 0.06. These values were compared to poly-energetic x-ray calculations assuming molybdenum and tungsten anodes in the range of 24 to 40 kVp. Good agreement to within 5% in DQE at all spatial frequencies was found. However, at high kVp, the mono-energetic approximation overestimated the AS and underestimated the AQ by as much as 10%.

Paper Details

Date Published: 5 June 2003
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 5030, Medical Imaging 2003: Physics of Medical Imaging, (5 June 2003); doi: 10.1117/12.480480
Show Author Affiliations
Robert M. Nishikawa, Univ. of Chicago (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5030:
Medical Imaging 2003: Physics of Medical Imaging
Martin J. Yaffe; Larry E. Antonuk, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top