Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Reticle process effects on OPC models
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

As critical dimensions (CDs) approach (lambda) /2, the use of optical proximity correction (OPC) relies heavily on the ability of the mask vendor to resolve the OPC structures consistently. When an OPC model is generated the reticle and wafer processing errors are merged, quantified, and fit to a theoretical model. The effectiveness of the OPC model depends greatly on model fit and therefore consistency in the reticle and wafer processing. Variations in either process can 'break' the model resulting in the wrong corrections being applied. Work is being done in an attempt to model the reticle and wafer processes separately as a means to allow an OPC model to be implemented in any mask process. Until this is possible, reticle factors will always be embedded in the model and need to be understood and controlled. Reticle manufacturing variables that effect OPC models are exposure tool resolution, etch process effects, and process push (pre-bias of the fractured data). Most of the errors from these reticle-manufacturing variables are seen during model generation, but there are some regions that are not and fail to be accounted for such as extremes in the line ends. Since these extreme regions of the mask containing the OPC have a higher mask error enhancement factor (MEEF) than that of the rest of the mask, controlling mask-induced variables is even more important. This paper quantifies the reticle error between different write tools (g-line vs. i-line vs. DUV lasers) and shows the effects reticle processing has on OPC model generation. It also depicts which structures are susceptible to reticle error more than others through reticle modeling and SEM images.

Paper Details

Date Published: 30 July 2002
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 4691, Optical Microlithography XV, (30 July 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.474521
Show Author Affiliations
Travis E. Brist, LSI Logic Corp. (United States)
George E. Bailey, LSI Logic Corp. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4691:
Optical Microlithography XV
Anthony Yen, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top