Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Overlay tool comparison for sub-130-nm technologies
Author(s): Beth Russo; Michael Bishop; David C. Benoit; Richard M. Silver
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

The Overlay Metrology Advisory Group (OMAG), which includes representatives from International SEMATECH Member Companies and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, has collaborated to create a unified specification for overlay measurement tools [1]. The methodology and results of an overlay benchmarking comparison of several tools are discussed in this paper. As device technologies shrink below the sub-130nm range, a critical need arises to develop more precise tools to measure overlay. Overlay metrology capability needs to be available for detecting and controlling total device overlay regardless of the source of error. The misregistration measurement uncertainty introduced by the overlay tool can be compared for several systems. A benchmarking study is currently underway and focuses on the existing technique of optical measurement of centerline offsets in different target designs. The critical parameters that the study analyzes include precision, accuracy, throughput, through focus measurements, and recipe portability. Imaging issues such as low contrast targets, across wafer thickness variation, CMP effects, and grainy metal targets can contribute greatly to overlay errors. Several process stacks were designed to incorporate some of these imaging issues and test the limitations of the overlay tools. The same set of wafers and test locations were measured at each supplier site and the results were analyzed. This paper focuses on the methodology used for overlay benchmarking and examples of the results generated with respect to the parameters tested.

Paper Details

Date Published: 16 July 2002
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 4689, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVI, (16 July 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.473464
Show Author Affiliations
Beth Russo, Motorola and International SEMATECH (United States)
Michael Bishop, International SEMATECH (United States)
David C. Benoit, Motorola (United States)
Richard M. Silver, National Institute of Standards and Technology (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4689:
Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVI
Daniel J. C. Herr, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top