Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Reticle defect printability: impact on yield and feedback to suppliers
Author(s): Robert Vinje; Arthur D. Klaum; David Chmielewski; Matt J. Lamantia; Dawn M. Woolery; Dianna L. Coburn; Colleen P. Weins
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The semiconductor industry continues to aggressively shrink linewidths and manufacture more closely spaced patterns to improve power and speed performances, as well as increase die per wafer counts. Current development is near 100 nm and high volume manufacturing is commonly near 150 nm. These smaller linewidths and more dense patterns are hampered with new populations of defects that were previously unimportant second or third order effects. As a result, new defects of interest must specifically be investigated, detected, and prevented on the reticles that hold master images of what is being printed. This is often difficult because reticle manufacturing, reticle defect detection, and reticle end-usage (manufacturer) typically spans three corporations. If defects occur on wafers that were not detected with current reticle inspection capabilities, there must be correlation from the printed wafer back to the reticle to assist the reticle supplier in locating the defect and working towards eliminating the problem. In some cases, photo defects may not impact device functionality. As a result closed-loop analyses and actions, which determine whether an event actually causes yield loss, must be developed into the business practices of multiple companies. This paper reports on an inter-company process (ICP) involving Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Dupont Photomask Incorporated, and KLA-Tencor. The ICP evaluates reticle defects on wafers, their impact on yield, and the transfer of the defect information back to the reticle vendor in an effort to improve overall reticle quality for a 150 nm and beyond semiconductor manufacturing fab.

Paper Details

Date Published: 27 December 2002
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 4889, 22nd Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology, (27 December 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.468087
Show Author Affiliations
Robert Vinje, Cypress Semiconductor Inc. (United States)
Arthur D. Klaum, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
David Chmielewski, Cypress Semiconductor Inc. (United States)
Matt J. Lamantia, DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (United States)
Dawn M. Woolery, Cypress Semiconductor Inc. (United States)
Dianna L. Coburn, Cypress Semiconductor Inc. (United States)
Colleen P. Weins, DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4889:
22nd Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology
Brian J. Grenon; Kurt R. Kimmel, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top