Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Advanced write tool effects on 100-nm node OPC
Author(s): Peter D. Buck; Kent G. Green; Kent B. Ibsen; Kent H. Nakagawa; Dongsung Hong; Prakash Krishnan; Dianna Coburn
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

It has long been understood that there is an image fidelity difference between the integrated circuit design pattern and the photomask made from that pattern, largely due to the finite spot size of pattern generators. Furthermore, there are known differences in photomask image fidelity (rounding, jogs, etc.) between e-beam and laser pattern generators. Using a novel technique developed by DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (DPI), actual photomask fidelity has been simulated from design data to produce a more true-to-life representation of the mask. We have performed analytical simulations and printed-wafer measurements on Cypress 100-nm technology designs to determine the differences and effects on optical proximity correction (OPC) of two types of pattern generators: 50 keV e-beam and DUV laser. Both JEOL 9000MV-II+ and ETEC ALTA 4000 images were simulated and saved in GDSII format (“mask-GDSII”). These new mask images were processed through standard lithography simulation software to predict the effects each mask writer has on localized optical proximity effects. Simulations were compared to printed wafer results. A detailed comparison of the accuracy of the mask-GDSII and original design GDSII is performed. Furthermore, comparison of 50 keV e-beam and DUV laser image fidelity is completed, and recommendations are made on how to correct OPC models for each type of photomask generator. Lastly, conclusions are drawn about the use of DUV laser and 50 keV e-beam photomasks.

Paper Details

Date Published: 27 December 2002
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 4889, 22nd Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology, (27 December 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.467761
Show Author Affiliations
Peter D. Buck, DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (United States)
Kent G. Green, Dupont Photomasks, Inc. (United States)
Kent B. Ibsen, DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (United States)
Kent H. Nakagawa, DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (United States)
Dongsung Hong, Cypress Semiconductor, Inc. (United States)
Prakash Krishnan, Cypress Semiconductor, Inc. (United States)
Dianna Coburn, Cypress Semiconductor, Inc. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4889:
22nd Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology
Brian J. Grenon; Kurt R. Kimmel, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top