Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Comparison of 3-D display formats for CAD applications
Author(s): Shane W. McWhorter; Larry F. Hodges; Walter E. Rodriguez
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

Two experiments were performed to rank different types of display formats common to CAD applications in terms of geometric information conveyed and perceived realism of objects. Display types tested were: wireframe, wireframe with hidden lines removed (HLR), shaded solid, orthogonal multiview, stereoscopic wireframe, stereoscopic HLR, and stereoscopic shaded solid. The results of the geometric information experiment indicated that the orthogonal multiview display was judged inferior to both the nonstereo and stereo pictorial displays and that the stereo displays were judged superior to the nonstereo displays in providing geometric information to the subject. Individual preferences among subjects, however, varied widely. The results of the realism experiment indicated that the flat shaded stereo, HLR stereo, and the flat shaded display types were judged to be equivalent and most realistic. The wireframe stereo, HLR, and wireframe displays were judged to be equivalent and less realistic. The orthogonal views display was judged to be the least realistic.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 August 1991
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 1457, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications II, (1 August 1991); doi: 10.1117/12.46297
Show Author Affiliations
Shane W. McWhorter, Georgia Institute of Technology (United States)
Larry F. Hodges, Georgia Institute of Technology (United States)
Walter E. Rodriguez, Georgia Institute of Technology (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 1457:
Stereoscopic Displays and Applications II
John O. Merritt; Scott S. Fisher, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top