Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Packaging for MEMS devices: stumbling block or enabling solution?
Author(s): Erik Jung; M. Wiemer; Volker Grosser; Karlheinz Bock; Juergen Wolf
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

MEMS devices may exhibit delicate structures sensitive to damage during handling or environmental influences. Their functionality may furthermore depend on sealing out the ambient or being in direct contact. Stress, thermal load or contaminations may change their characteristics. Here packaging technology is challenged to extend from microelectronics towards MEMS and MOEMS. Today's approaches typically rely on housing the miniature devices in bulky ceramic or metal casing or putting them into very high volume production-, benefiting from the microelectronics packaging infrastructure. Alternatively, besides focusing on available technology, device manufacturers develop individual packages for their product typically at high cost. While there is nowadays a good infrastructure for MEMS realization from universities to MEMS foundries, packaging still remains as a bottleneck at the end of the design cycle, sometimes stopping a device from being commercialized. Selecting the proper packaging method may tip the scale towards a product success and a product failure. Choosing the right technology therefore is not only a marginal work package but also a crucial part of the product design. Three approaches to be applied for MEMS/MOEMS devices will be presented and highlighted by examples. Single die packaging, die-to-wafer processes as well as wafer level packaging options are detailed with their individual benefits and challenges. Mechanical, fluidic and optical aspects are reflected in the package technologies selected for the individual examples presented. Accelerated testing of the packaged devices under actual conditions may also be a stumbling block; one example on an optical microsystem will showcase this issue, highlighting system response under different environmental loads.

Paper Details

Date Published: 19 April 2002
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 4755, Design, Test, Integration, and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS 2002, (19 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462849
Show Author Affiliations
Erik Jung, Fraunhofer-Institut fuer Zuverlaessigkeit und Mikrointegration (Germany)
M. Wiemer, Fraunhofer-Institut fuer Zuverlaessigkeit und Miknointegration (Germany)
Volker Grosser, Fraunhofer-Institut fuer Zuverlaessigkeit und Mikrointegration (Germany)
Karlheinz Bock, Fraunhofer-Institut fuer Zuverlaessigkeit und Miknointegration (Germany)
Juergen Wolf, Fraunhofer-Institut fuer Zuverlassigkeit und Mikrointegration (Germany)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4755:
Design, Test, Integration, and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS 2002
Bernard Courtois; Jean Michel Karam; Karen W. Markus; Bernd Michel; Tamal Mukherjee; James A. Walker, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top