Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Screen film versus digital mammography: a perceptual analysis of postprocessed hard copy images
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

In this investigation we studied the imaging characteristics of a mammographic screen-film (MinR-2000, Eastman Kodak Co.) and an amorphous-silicon flat-panel digital mammography system (Senographe 2000D, GE Medical Systems) based on information perception by human observers. The focus of the study was to utilize an effective means to estimate the contrast-detail characteristics of x-ray imaging systems at various threshold levels to evaluate system performance with reduced observer subjectivity. We obtained three images of a contrast-detail phantom (CDMAM, Nuclear Associates) with screen-film and three images with digital mammography under identical exposure conditions. The digital images were printed using dry film printer (DryView 8600, Eastman Kodak Co.) after being windowed/leveled appropriately by two experienced radiologists. Seven observers reviewed the images and 'proportion correct' detection data were computed for each observer. A psychophysical signal detection model that hypothesizes a continuous decision variable internal to the observer with Gaussian probability density functions was used to fit the experimental observer data. Projection data from the detection curves at 50%, 62.5%, and 75% threshold levels were used to generate contrast-detail diagrams. Digital mammography, on average, exhibited lower (better) threshold contrast-detail characteristics compared to screen-film mammography.

Paper Details

Date Published: 12 April 2002
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 4686, Medical Imaging 2002: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462692
Show Author Affiliations
Sankararaman Suryanarayanan, Univ. of Massachusetts Medical School/UMass Memorial Health Care (United States)
Andrew Karellas, Univ. of Massachusetts Medical School/UMass Memorial Health Care (United States)
Srinivasan Vedantham, Univ. of Massachusetts Medical School/UMass Memorial Health Care (United States)
Hetal Ved, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (United States)
Carl J. D'Orsi, Univ. of Massachusetts Medical School/UMass Memorial Health Care (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4686:
Medical Imaging 2002: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Dev Prasad Chakraborty; Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top