Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Detecting abnormalities in noncued areas of digitized mammograms: an observer experience
Author(s): William R. Poller; Bin Zheng; Jules H. Sumkin; David Gur
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

To assess the performance levels of a radiologist in detecting non-cued masses and microcalcification clusters depicted on digitized mammograms, 120 mammograms depicting 57 verified masses and 38 microcalcification clusters were selected. During an observer performance study, the images were displayed on a computer monitor. Except for the first mode where no regions were cued, the images were cued in the other four modes using a combination of two cueing sensitivities (90% and 50%) and two false-positive rates (0.5 and 2 per image). One reader ignored all cued regions and identified suspicious regions only in non-cued areas. We examined how the performance of this observer was affected using the different cueing modes. Detection sensitivities of non-cued mammographic abnormalities ranged from 43% to 60%, which were lower (P<EQ0.05) than the 76% sensitivity achieved in the non-cued mode. Increasing the false-positive cueing rate from 0.5 to 2 per image reduced (<0.05) the detection sensitivity in the non-cued areas. When using a low performing cueing system, the performance reduction in non-cued areas might offset performance gains in cued areas, resulting in a negative impact on overall performance of the radiologists.

Paper Details

Date Published: 12 April 2002
PDF: 5 pages
Proc. SPIE 4686, Medical Imaging 2002: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, (12 April 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.462665
Show Author Affiliations
William R. Poller, Univ. of Pittsburgh and Magee Womens Hospital/Univ. of Pittsburgh (United States)
Bin Zheng, Univ. of Pittsburgh and Magee Womens Hospital/Univ. of Pittsburgh (United States)
Jules H. Sumkin, Univ. of Pittsburgh and Magee Womens Hospital/Univ. of Pittsburgh (United States)
David Gur, Univ. of Pittsburgh and Magee Womens Hospital/Univ. of Pittsburgh (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4686:
Medical Imaging 2002: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Dev Prasad Chakraborty; Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top