Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Numerical and experimental studies of pellicle-induced photomask distortions
Author(s): Eric P. Cotte; Roxann L. Engelstad; Edward G. Lovell; Yuri M. Shkel; Florence O. Eschbach; Emily Y. Shu; Daniel Tanzil; Rebecca Calhoun
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Meeting the stringent error budget of 157-nm lithography for manufacturing devices in the sub-100 nm regime requires that all mask-related distortions be minimized, corrected, or eliminated. Sources include the pellicle system, which has been previously identified as a potential cause of image placement error. To characterize pellicle-induced distortions, finite element (FE) models have been developed to simulate system fabrication, including soft pellicles as well as prototype fused silica (hard) pellicles. The main sources of distortions are: (a) temperature variations, (b) initially distorted components, and (c) sag-induced refraction. Temperature variations are an issue if pellicle mounting and exposure take place at different temperatures. Sources of attachment-induced distortions include the initial frame curvature, initial reticle shape, attachment method (mounting tools-induced), frame and gasket materials, and the hard pellicle bow. These attachment-induced distortions were modeled using experimentally measured values of Young's modulus for adhesive gaskets. Refraction aberration is an issue with bowed hard pellicles which act as optical elements and induce image degradation. These effects were assessed and found to be significant. Results from the experiments and comprehensive FE simulations have characterized the relative importance of the principal sources of pellicle-induced photomask distortions for 157-nm lithography.

Paper Details

Date Published: 11 March 2002
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 4562, 21st Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology, (11 March 2002); doi: 10.1117/12.458346
Show Author Affiliations
Eric P. Cotte, Univ. of Wisconsin/Madison (United States)
Roxann L. Engelstad, Univ. of Wisconsin/Madison (United States)
Edward G. Lovell, Univ. of Wisconsin/Madison (United States)
Yuri M. Shkel, Univ. of Wisconsin/Madison (United States)
Florence O. Eschbach, Intel Corp. (United States)
Emily Y. Shu, Intel Corp. (United States)
Daniel Tanzil, Intel Corp. (United States)
Rebecca Calhoun, Intel Corp. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4562:
21st Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology
Giang T. Dao; Brian J. Grenon, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top