Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Comparative evaluation of neural-based versus conventional segmentors
Author(s): Cindy Evors Daniell; David Kemsley; Xavier Bouyssounouse
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Boundary segmentation has long been a problem for automatic target recognizers. Its performance is crucial because it serves as the front end to the entire system. The authors examine and compare the characteristics and capabilities of four segmentors: the Boundary Contour System, the Meyer Line Finder, the Canny, and the Sobel Edge Detector. The first three models are 'smart' systems, that is, they have some 'higher level' processing capability, while the Sobel is a simple operator. In addition, the Boundary Contour System is neural based while the remaining three are conventional. The performance of each segmentor is evaluated with respect to the following image metrics: signal-to-noise, contrast, resolution, and the following boundary characteristics: spatial frequency, edge orientation. Both computer and terrain board modeled infrared imagery is used. Performance is quantified through both segmentation accuracy measures and visual fidelity.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 August 1991
PDF: 16 pages
Proc. SPIE 1471, Automatic Object Recognition, (1 August 1991); doi: 10.1117/12.44900
Show Author Affiliations
Cindy Evors Daniell, Hughes Aircraft Co. (United States)
David Kemsley, Hughes Aircraft Co. (United States)
Xavier Bouyssounouse, Hughes Aircraft Co. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 1471:
Automatic Object Recognition
Firooz A. Sadjadi, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top