Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

RuMBa: a rule-model OPC for low MEEF 130-nm KrF lithography
Author(s): Stephen Hsu; Xuelong Shi; Chungwei Michael Hsu; Noel P. Corcoran; J. Fung Chen; Sunil Desai; Micheal J. Sherrill; Y. C. Tseng; H. A. Chang; J. F. Kao; Alex Tseng; WeiJyh Liu; Anseime Chen; Arthur Lin; Jan Pieter Kujten; Eric Jacobs; Arjan Verhappen
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

For cost effective 130nm node manufacturing, it is prefer to use KrF binary chrome mask. To realize a production worth process for making random logic device, we need to effectively control mask error enhancement factor (MEEF) through pitch. In low k1 lithography, process parameters such as focus, lens aberration, linewidth, and line pitch, style of proximity correction (OPC), and resist process conditions, etc., all impact MEEF. We show a powerful RuMBa OPC method that can reduce MEEF to an acceptable level (close to 1(using KrF resist process. We believe that RuMBa OPC method can be further extended for sub 100nm ArF process. In wafer printing experiment, we have designed a new style of LineSweeper reticles for our lithography process optimization. Both simulated and printed wafer CD data were used to calculate the overlapped process window along with respective MEEF. These are the metric we used to assess the 130nm process performance. Using RuMBa OPC, we are able to achieve overlapped process window that is sufficient for 130nm gate mask process. The CD through pitch calibration is critical for an accurate model-based correct at location where OPC rule cannot cover. A high accuracy CD through pitch calibration methodology is developed for model calibration. In this paper, we have compared the 130nm performance using KrF binary mask, KrF 6% attenuated PSM, and ArF binary mask.

Paper Details

Date Published: 5 September 2001
PDF: 14 pages
Proc. SPIE 4409, Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology VIII, (5 September 2001); doi: 10.1117/12.438410
Show Author Affiliations
Stephen Hsu, ASML MaskTools, Inc. (United States)
Xuelong Shi, ASML MaskTools, Inc. (United States)
Chungwei Michael Hsu, ASML MaskTools, Inc. (United States)
Noel P. Corcoran, ASML MaskTools, Inc. (United States)
J. Fung Chen, ASML MaskTools, Inc. (United States)
Sunil Desai, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Micheal J. Sherrill, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Y. C. Tseng, United Microelectronics Corp. (Taiwan)
H. A. Chang, United Microelectronics Corp. (Taiwan)
J. F. Kao, United Microelectronics Corp. (Taiwan)
Alex Tseng, United Microelectronics Corp. (Taiwan)
WeiJyh Liu, United Microelectronics Corp. (Taiwan)
Anseime Chen, United Microelectronics Corp. (Taiwan)
Arthur Lin, Grand Technology, Inc. (Taiwan)
Jan Pieter Kujten, ASML (Netherlands)
Eric Jacobs, ASML (Netherlands)
Arjan Verhappen, ASML (Netherlands)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4409:
Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology VIII
Hiroichi Kawahira, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top