Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Optimization of ArF resist for 100-nm node: DOE and fine-tuning of basic platform
Author(s): Keeho Kim; Gregory M. Wells; Won D. Kim; Yong-Jun Choi; Se-Jin Choi; Yang-Sook Kim; Deog-Bae Kim
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

ArF lithography is pushing its limit to beyond the 100-nm node due to delay of NGL technologies to meet the aggressive insertion schedules. However, lithography process for 100-nm node with binary mask and ArF resist is still not easy to achieve and will be one of the big challenges for lithography community. Although there have been significant improvements over the past year, ArF resists remain as the most critical aspect in ArF lithography development. Areas of concern for ArF resist include; higher level of environmental instability compared to KrF materials, different response depending on the tone of reticles, and different performance exhibited between microsteppers used for initial development and full field scanners to be used in manufacturing. We expect that these problems will be getting worse in sub 100-nm node. To achieve the most challenging performance goals, the resist to be used in manufacturing will require optimization of the chemical formulation of commercialized resists based on specific design requirements, process and environmental conditions. This paper will describe an extensive DOE (design of experiments) that was performed in order to find better resist formulation from commercialized resists for our specific FAB environment. PAG, resin and amine were main three components for this DOE. After choosing the best resist for 100-nm node, we have will evaluated actual lithographic performance capability such as DOF, exposure latitude, etc.

Paper Details

Date Published: 24 August 2001
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 4345, Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XVIII, (24 August 2001); doi: 10.1117/12.436846
Show Author Affiliations
Keeho Kim, Texas Instruments Inc. (United States)
Gregory M. Wells, Texas Instruments Inc. (United States)
Won D. Kim, Texas Instruments Inc. (United States)
Yong-Jun Choi, DongJin Semichem Co., Ltd. (South Korea)
Se-Jin Choi, DongJin Semichem Co., Ltd. (South Korea)
Yang-Sook Kim, DongJin Semichem Co., Ltd. (South Korea)
Deog-Bae Kim, DongJin Semichem Co., Ltd. (South Korea)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4345:
Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XVIII
Francis M. Houlihan, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top