Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Evaluation of algorithms for fusing infrared and synthetic imagery
Author(s): Philippe Simard; Norah K. Link; Ronald V. Kruk
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Algorithms for image fusion were evaluated as part of the development of an airborne Enhanced/Synthetic Vision System (ESVS) for helicopter Search and Rescue operations. The ESVS will be displayed on a high- resolution, wide field-of-view helmet-mounted display (HMD). The HMD full field-of-view (FOV) will consist of a synthetic image to support navigation and situational awareness, and an infrared image inset will be fused into the center of the FOV to provide real-world feedback and support flight operations at low altitudes. Three fusion algorithms were selected for evaluation against the ESVS requirements. In particular, algorithms were modified and tested against the unique problem of presenting a useful fusion of varying quality. A pixel averaging algorithm was selected as the simplest way to fuse two difference sources of imagery. Two other algorithms, originally developed for real- time fusion of low-light visible images with infrared images, (one at the TNO Human Factors Institute and the other at the MIT Lincoln Laboratory) were adapted and implemented. To evaluate the algorithms' performance, artificially generated infrared images were fused with synthetic images and viewed in a sequence corresponding to a search and rescue scenario for a descent to hover. Application of all three fusion algorithms improved the raw infrared image, but the MIT-based algorithm generated some undesirable effects such as contrast reversals. This algorithm was also computationally intensive and relatively difficult to tun. The pixel averaging problem was simplest in terms of per-pixel operations and provided good results. The TNO-based algorithm was superior in that while it was slightly more complex than pixel averaging, it demonstrated similar results, was more flexible, and had the advantage of predictably preserving certain synthetic features which could be used to support obstacle detection.

Paper Details

Date Published: 23 June 2000
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 4023, Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2000, (23 June 2000); doi: 10.1117/12.389336
Show Author Affiliations
Philippe Simard, McGill Univ (Canada)
Norah K. Link, CAE Electronics Ltd. (Canada)
Ronald V. Kruk, CAE Electronics Ltd. (Canada)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4023:
Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2000
Jacques G. Verly, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top