Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Do subtle breast cancers attract visual attention during initial impression?
Author(s): Calvin F. Nodine; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Susan P. Weinstein; Harold L. Kundel; Lawrence C. Toto
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Women who undergo regular mammographic screening afford mammographers a unique opportunity to compare current mammograms with prior exams. This comparison greatly assists mammographers in detecting early breast cancer. A question that commonly arises when a cancer is detected under regular periodic screening conditions is whether the caner is new, or was it missed on the prior exam? This is a difficult question to answer by retrospective analysis, because knowledge of the status of the current exam biases the interpretation of the prior exam. To eliminate this bias and provide some degree of objectivity in studying this question, we looked at whether experienced mammographers who had no prior knowledge of a set of test cases fixated on potential cancer-containing regions on mammograms from cases penultimate to cancer detection. The results show that experienced mammographers cannot recognize most malignant cancers selected by retrospective analysis.

Paper Details

Date Published: 14 April 2000
PDF: 4 pages
Proc. SPIE 3981, Medical Imaging 2000: Image Perception and Performance, (14 April 2000); doi: 10.1117/12.383103
Show Author Affiliations
Calvin F. Nodine, Univ. of Pennsylvania (United States)
Claudia Mello-Thoms, Univ. of Pennsylvania (United States)
Susan P. Weinstein, Univ. of Pennsylvania (United States)
Harold L. Kundel, Univ. of Pennsylvania (United States)
Lawrence C. Toto, Univ. of Pennsylvania (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 3981:
Medical Imaging 2000: Image Perception and Performance
Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top