Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications
Author(s): Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A. Helvie; Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; Dorit D. Adler; Caroline E. Blane; Lynn K. Joynt; Chintana Paramagul; Marilyn A. Roubidoux; Todd E. Wilson; Lubomir M. Hadjiiski; Mitchell M. Goodsitt
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of pixel size on the characterization of mammographic microcalcifications. Digital mammograms were obtained by digitizing screen-film mammograms with a laser film scanner. One hundred twelve two-view mammograms with biopsy-proven microcalcifications were digitized at a pixel size of 35 micrometer X 35 micrometer. A region of interest (ROI) containing the microcalcifications was extracted from each image. ROI images with pixel sizes of 70 micrometers, 105 micrometers, and 140 micrometers were derived from the ROI of 35 micrometer pixel size by averaging 2 X 2, 3 X 3, and 4 X 4 neighboring pixels, respectively. The ROI images were printed on film with a laser imager. Seven MQSA-approved radiologists participated as observers. The likelihood of malignancy of the microcalcifications was rated on a 10-point confidence rating scale and analyzed with ROC methodology. The classification accuracy was quantified by the area, Az, under the ROC curve. The statistical significance of the differences in the Az values for different pixel sizes was estimated with the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz (DBM) method for multi-reader, multi-case ROC data. It was found that five of the seven radiologists demonstrated a higher classification accuracy with the 70 micrometer or 105 micrometer images. The average Az also showed a higher classification accuracy in the range of 70 to 105 micrometer pixel size. However, the differences in A(subscript z/ between different pixel sizes did not achieve statistical significance. The low specificity of image features of microcalcifications an the large interobserver and intraobserver variabilities may have contributed to the relatively weak dependence of classification accuracy on pixel size.

Paper Details

Date Published: 28 May 1999
PDF: 4 pages
Proc. SPIE 3659, Medical Imaging 1999: Physics of Medical Imaging, (28 May 1999); doi: 10.1117/12.349514
Show Author Affiliations
Heang-Ping Chan, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Mark A. Helvie, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Nicholas Petrick, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Berkman Sahiner, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Dorit D. Adler, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Caroline E. Blane, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Lynn K. Joynt, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Chintana Paramagul, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Marilyn A. Roubidoux, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Todd E. Wilson, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Lubomir M. Hadjiiski, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Mitchell M. Goodsitt, Univ. of Michigan (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 3659:
Medical Imaging 1999: Physics of Medical Imaging
John M. Boone; James T. Dobbins, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top