
Proceedings Paper
Local and global strategies for InSAR phase unwrappingFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$14.40 | $18.00 |
![]() |
GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. | Check Access |
Paper Abstract
In the last years, both local and global analysis techniques for the effective processing of interferometric SAR data have been proposed. We developed two local approaches to eliminate inconsistencies in the measured (wrapped) phase field, based on the local configurations of phase gradients in finite windows. The first technique adopts a fixed search strategy which 'cures' isolated residue couples by an appropriate series of corrections determined a priori. A second strategy uses the generalization capabilities of a neural network, trained on a suitable number of simulated target phase fields, to add 2 - (pi) cycles to the proper locations of the interferogram. These approaches, in spite of the high dimensionality of this problem, are able to correctly remove more than half the original number of pointlike inconsistencies on real noisy interferograms. This stems from the observation that phase unwrapping is an ill-posed problem, which has to be solved globally. Hence, a global stochastic method has been implemented, based on the minimization of a functional measuring the regularity of the phase field. The optimization tool used is simulated annealing with constraints. This methodology gives excellent results also in difficult conditions. We will present some of the recent results which aim at integrating the above-mentioned methodologies into powerful processing chains optimized for operating on large IFSAR datasets from real scenes. The effectiveness of such phase retrieving methods allows the application of sophisticated and innovative remote sensing techniques, such as differential interferometry.
Paper Details
Date Published: 20 November 1998
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 3497, SAR Image Analysis, Modeling, and Techniques, (20 November 1998); doi: 10.1117/12.331345
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 3497:
SAR Image Analysis, Modeling, and Techniques
Francesco Posa, Editor(s)
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 3497, SAR Image Analysis, Modeling, and Techniques, (20 November 1998); doi: 10.1117/12.331345
Show Author Affiliations
Alberto Refice, INFM (Italy)
Maria Teresa Chiaradia, INFM (Italy)
Luciano Guerriero, INFM (Italy)
Giovanni Nico, INFM (Italy)
Palma N. Blonda, Istituto Elaborazione Segnali ed Immagini-CNR (Italy)
Maria Teresa Chiaradia, INFM (Italy)
Luciano Guerriero, INFM (Italy)
Giovanni Nico, INFM (Italy)
Palma N. Blonda, Istituto Elaborazione Segnali ed Immagini-CNR (Italy)
Guido Pasquariello, Istituto Elaborazione Segnali ed Immagini-CNR (Italy)
Giuseppe Satalino, Istituto Elaborazione Segnali ed Immagini-CNR (Italy)
Sebastiano Stramaglia, Istituto Elaborazione Segnali ed Immagini-CNR (Italy)
Nicola Veneziani, Istituto Elaborazione Segnali ed Immagini-CNR (Italy)
Giuseppe Satalino, Istituto Elaborazione Segnali ed Immagini-CNR (Italy)
Sebastiano Stramaglia, Istituto Elaborazione Segnali ed Immagini-CNR (Italy)
Nicola Veneziani, Istituto Elaborazione Segnali ed Immagini-CNR (Italy)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 3497:
SAR Image Analysis, Modeling, and Techniques
Francesco Posa, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
