Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper • new

Laguerre-Gauss and sparse difference-of-Gaussians observer models for signal detection using constrained reconstruction in magnetic resonance imaging
Author(s): Angel R. Pineda
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data acquisition is sometimes accelerated by pseudo-random under-sampling of the frequency domain which is followed by constrained reconstruction. This approach to acceleration assumes a certain level of sparsity of the object being imaged. The sparsity is typically considered for the background anatomy but not explored in terms of a signal detection task. In this study we implement a 2.56x one dimensional acceleration in the acquisition using fully sampled low frequencies and randomly sampled high frequencies with a total variation reconstruction. A small and a large lesion were synthetically placed in a 3D MRI volume in non-overlapping regions. From 40 slices of this volume and 16 regions per slice, 640 sub-images with and without signals were generated to estimate the detection performance of lesions with anatomical variation. We compared the effect of this approach on signal detection using a channelized Hotelling observer approximating the ideal linear observer (with 10 Laguerre-Gauss channels) and one approximating a human observer (with sparse difference-of-Gaussians channels). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was estimated using the Mann-Whitney statistic and the uncertainty of the estimate was assessed using a bootstrap distribution with 10,000 samples. We found that for these two tasks and model observers, total variation did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in detection performance and that the effect of regularization was larger for the Laguerre-Gauss model than for the sparse difference-of-Gaussians model.

Paper Details

Date Published: 4 March 2019
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 10952, Medical Imaging 2019: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 109520A (4 March 2019); doi: 10.1117/12.2512813
Show Author Affiliations
Angel R. Pineda, Manhattan College (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 10952:
Medical Imaging 2019: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Robert M. Nishikawa; Frank W. Samuelson, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top