Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Minimizing tone reversal during 19x nm mask inspection: PMJ18 Best Paper (Conference Presentation)
Author(s): Masashi Yonetani; Kazunori Seki; Karen D. Badger; Anka Birnstein; Jan Heumann; Takeshi Isogawa; Toshio Konishi; Yutaka Kodera
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

EUV (Extreme Ultraviolet) lithography is one of the most promising techniques for imaging 5-nm node and beyond wafer features. Mask defects that matter are the ones that print during exposure at 13.5 nm wavelength. To support EUV development and production schedules, mask defectivity must be reduced to be at or near the optical defect levels. This task is complicated by the fact that actinic EUV mask inspectors are not currently available. In the absence of an actinic EUV inspection tool, all available methods for detecting and characterizing defects must be deployed. Based on extensive deployment and experience in the industry with optical masks, and on its record for reasonable throughput, 19x nm wavelength inspection is one of the strongest candidates available today, for the initial EUV mask inspection approach. However, there are several key challenges with 19x nm optical inspection of EUV masks. One such challenge is defect sensitivity. Another challenge is that EUV mask pattern image contrast changes as a function of pattern size and pitch. This is often referred to as “Tone Reversal”, and it is a phenomenon that occurs for specific features. It is essential to understand the impact of tone reversal on defect sensitivity and overall inspectability, specifically for image sizes and pitches at the point of tone reversal, and for those immediately on either side of the tone reversal. In this study, the relationship between base pattern contrast and absorber defect sensitivity will be discussed through the analysis of programmed defect macros (PDMs). We will also discuss whether we can influence the point at which tone reversal occurs and furthermore, whether that reversal point can be tailored to specific patterns sizes or pitches. We will demonstrate how inspection parameter optimization can be done to tailor 19x inspection to specific layer and specific groundrules to maximize both sensitivity and inspectability.

Paper Details

Date Published: 12 October 2018
Proc. SPIE 10810, Photomask Technology 2018, 1081007 (12 October 2018); doi: 10.1117/12.2503808
Show Author Affiliations
Masashi Yonetani, Toppan Photomasks, Inc. (United States)
Kazunori Seki, Toppan Printing Co., Ltd. (Japan)
Karen D. Badger, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (United States)
Anka Birnstein, Advanced Mask Technology Ctr. GmbH Co. KG (Germany)
Jan Heumann, Advanced Mask Technology Ctr. GmbH Co. KG (Germany)
Takeshi Isogawa, Toppan Printing Co., Ltd. (Japan)
Toshio Konishi, Toppan Printing Co., Ltd. (Japan)
Yutaka Kodera, Toppan Printing Co., Ltd. (Japan)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 10810:
Photomask Technology 2018
Emily E. Gallagher; Jed H. Rankin, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top