Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Comparison of regression functions in a shallow convolutional neural network for natural image sharpness assessment
Author(s): Ruoyu Li; Zhaoyang Wang; Zhicheng Zhang; Shaode Yu; Tiexiang Wen; Yaoqin Xie
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Our previous study proposed a shallow convolutional neural network (CNN) to quantify the sharpness of natural images. The network utilized a multilayer perceptron (MLP) as its regression function in the full-connection layer. In this paper, we make use of a polynomial mapping (the logistic map, LM) as the regression function in the natural image sharpness assessment (NISA). First, the coefficient of logistic map is experimentally determined based on the database of LIVE-II. Then, the prediction performance is evaluated on Gaussian blurred images from CSIQ and TID2013. After that, three regression functions, LM, BCF (the basic cubical function) and MLP, are evaluated with Pearson linear correlation coefficient (PLCC) and Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient (SROCC). In addition, eleven state-of-the-art NISA models are compared. Based on the same shallow CNN architecture, experimental results indicate that MLP achieves the best performance, followed by BCF and LM. Furthermore, its performance is rival to or better than other NISA models. Conclusively, in comparison to LM and BCF, MLP is relatively better as a regression function for automatic network optimization and numerical regression. Meanwhile, it achieves the state-of-the-art performance in NISA task.

Paper Details

Date Published: 9 August 2018
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 10806, Tenth International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP 2018), 108064O (9 August 2018); doi: 10.1117/12.2503060
Show Author Affiliations
Ruoyu Li, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (China)
Wuhan Research Institute of Posts and Telecommunications (China)
Zhaoyang Wang, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (China)
Northeastern Univ. (China)
Zhicheng Zhang, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (China)
Shaode Yu, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (China)
Univ. of Chinese Academy of Sciences (China)
Tiexiang Wen, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (China)
Yaoqin Xie, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (China)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 10806:
Tenth International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP 2018)
Xudong Jiang; Jenq-Neng Hwang, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top