Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Comparing motion-interpolation structures for video coding
Author(s): Atul Puri; R. Aravind
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

This paper considers the topic of video compression at bit-rates around 1 Mbps for digital storage/playback applications. The backbone algorithm employed is the well-known motion-compensated prediction-error coder. This approach is considerably enhanced by the incorporation of conditional motion-compensated interpolation (CMCI), where some of the video frames are encoded with prediction-error coding and the remainder are encoded with motion-compensated interpolation and interpolation-error coding. The advantage of this combined technique is that interpolation errors can be coded with much fewer bits than prediction errors for similar reconstructed-picture quality. We consider two different techniques for estimating motion in CMCI- coded frames. In order to facilitate direct interaction with the bit-stream, the input sequence is divided into groups such that one frame in each group is intra-coded. The arrangement of predictive- and CMCI-coded frames can be varied; a study of these arrangements is the major focus of this paper. Structures with one-, two- and four-frame interpolation are compared. Our results indicate that one-frame interpolation is inferior to two-frame interpolation on complex test material. Four-frame interpolation is comparable in performance to two-frame interpolation as long as the motion is compensable.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 September 1990
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 1360, Visual Communications and Image Processing '90: Fifth in a Series, (1 September 1990); doi: 10.1117/12.24201
Show Author Affiliations
Atul Puri, AT&T Bell Labs. (United States)
R. Aravind, AT&T Bell Labs. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 1360:
Visual Communications and Image Processing '90: Fifth in a Series
Murat Kunt, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top