Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Adaptable edge quality metric
Author(s): Robin N. Strickland; Dunkai K. Chang
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

A new quality metric for evaluating edges detected by digital image processing algorithms is presented. The metric is a weighted sum of measures of edge continuity, smoothness, thinness, localization, detection, and noisiness. Through a training process, we can design weights which optimize the metric for different users and applications. We have used the metric to compare the results of ten edge detectors when applied to edges degraded by varying degrees of blur and varying degrees and types of noise. As expected, the more optimum Difference-of-Gaussians (DOG) and Haralick methods outperform the simpler gradient detectors. At high signal-to-noise (SNR) ratios, Haralick's method is the best choice, although it exhibits a sudden drop in performance at lower SNRs. The DOG filter's performance degrades almost linearly with SNR, and maintains a reasonably high level at lower SNRs. The same relative performances are observed as blur is varied. For most of the detectors tested, performance drops with increasing noise correlation. Noise correlated in the same direction as the edge is the most destructive of the noise types tested.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 September 1990
PDF: 14 pages
Proc. SPIE 1360, Visual Communications and Image Processing '90: Fifth in a Series, (1 September 1990); doi: 10.1117/12.24112
Show Author Affiliations
Robin N. Strickland, Univ. of Arizona (United States)
Dunkai K. Chang, Univ. of Arizona (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 1360:
Visual Communications and Image Processing '90: Fifth in a Series
Murat Kunt, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top