Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Comparative study of wavelet methods in ground vehicle signature analysis
Author(s): Robert E. Karlsen; Thomas J. Meitzler; Grant R. Gerhart; David J. Gorsich; Howard C. Choe
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

In this paper we make a comparison between wavelet transforms and the local cosine transform of various types of images. This builds on our previous work involving acoustic signals, where we found that the local cosine transform gave a more compact representation for certain types of signals and performed as well as wavelets for others. This held even for signals that were transient in nature, where one might expect the wavelets to do better. We are interested in determining if the same holds true for images, which tend to include many transients, such as edges. We are also investigating the extent to which the rms error can be used to evaluate the perceptual quality of the reconstructed images.

Paper Details

Date Published: 22 March 1996
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 2762, Wavelet Applications III, (22 March 1996); doi: 10.1117/12.236006
Show Author Affiliations
Robert E. Karlsen, U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Command (United States)
Thomas J. Meitzler, U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Command (United States)
Grant R. Gerhart, U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Command (United States)
David J. Gorsich, U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Command (United States)
Howard C. Choe, SWI Technologies (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2762:
Wavelet Applications III
Harold H. Szu, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top