Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Predicting depth discrimination performance under hyperstereoscopic display conditions
Author(s): Charles J. Lloyd; Marc Winterbottom; Eleanor O'Keefe; Tommy Bullock
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

This paper describes an evaluation of the capability of two tests of vision, stereoacuity and fusion recovery range, to predict depth discrimination performance for subjects using a hyperstereoscopic display system. For the hyperstereo performance evaluation, 14 subjects completed a depth discrimination task presented at multiple positions and depths in a remote vision system (RVS) simulation similar to that used by air refueling operators on the KC-46 aircraft. Prior to performing the hyperstereo task, each subject completed automated tests of stereoacuity and binocular fusion recovery range. Evaluation results indicate that both stereoacuity (R2 = 0.64) and recovery range (R2 = 0.45) reliably predict (p ≤ 0.01) hyperstereo depth discrimination performance. The use of a two-factor model improves predictive capability (R2 = 0.73); however, the utility of including recovery range scores depended on viewing conditions. When easy viewing conditions (high contrast stimuli presented near the depth of the display) were used, performance was predicted by stereoacuity and the prediction was not improved using recovery range scores. Under difficult viewing conditions (low contrast stimuli, background clutter, crosstalk, and dipvergence), the prediction of hyperstereo performance was significantly improved by including recovery range scores. These results suggest that a binocular fusion recovery range test should be used in conjunction with a stereoacuity test to predict the performance of operators using hyperstereoscopic displays under the more difficult viewing conditions that can be expected in operational environments. Stereoscopic display design considerations and the importance of computer-based vision testing will be discussed in detail.

Paper Details

Date Published: 2 May 2018
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 10642, Degraded Environments: Sensing, Processing, and Display 2018, 1064207 (2 May 2018); doi: 10.1117/12.2305507
Show Author Affiliations
Charles J. Lloyd, Visual Performance, LLC (United States)
Marc Winterbottom, Operational Based Vision Assessment Lab. (United States)
Eleanor O'Keefe, Operational Based Vision Assessment Lab. (United States)
Tommy Bullock, Operational Based Vision Assessment Lab. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 10642:
Degraded Environments: Sensing, Processing, and Display 2018
John (Jack) N. Sanders-Reed; Jarvis (Trey) J. Arthur III, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top