Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Evaluation of commercial and experimental resist materials for use in MEBES mask making
Author(s): Charles A. Sauer; Robert L. Dean; Etsuya Morita; Zoilo C. H. Tan; Bruce W. Smith; Dale E. Ewbank; Sid P. Duttagupta; Anne Rudack
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The SIA roadmap has identified CD control as a critical issue in mask making. PBS, the most popular resist used for electron-beam mask making in the U.S., may not perform at the level required for production of 250 nm devices. There is a need in the industry today for precise CD control and tight control of CD uniformity, as well as a desire to dry etch thin films on masks. These industry trends make the use of an alternative resist attractive. A project was initiated to determine if an acceptable substitute to PBS exists. A group of eleven negative and positive resists were examined. These included chemically amplified materials, two part- novolacs, and a silicon-containing resist, among others. The resists were evaluated by using design of experiments (DOE) methodology whenever possible. All masks were exposed on 10 kV MEBES writing tools. The results were tabulated and compared, using a SEMATECH criterion for acceptability. Results are presented, including optimization of some of the materials for sensitivity, process robustness, and dry etch capability. While none of the materials met all criteria, several resists performed at a level that make them candidates to replace PBS. Several options are presented that are of interest to the mask maker contemplating process changes to accommodate 250 nm and 180 nm technologies.

Paper Details

Date Published: 8 December 1995
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 2621, 15th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology and Management, (8 December 1995); doi: 10.1117/12.228215
Show Author Affiliations
Charles A. Sauer, Etec Systems, Inc. (United States)
Robert L. Dean, Etec Systems, Inc. (United States)
Etsuya Morita, Etec Systems, Inc. (United States)
Zoilo C. H. Tan, Etec Systems, Inc. (United States)
Bruce W. Smith, Rochester Institute of Technology (United States)
Dale E. Ewbank, Rochester Institute of Technology (United States)
Sid P. Duttagupta, Rochester Institute of Technology (United States)
Anne Rudack, SEMATECH (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2621:
15th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology and Management
Gilbert V. Shelden; James N. Wiley, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top