Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Comparison of active, passive and adaptive phase error compensation methods using a universal phase error model
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

Nonlinear intensity response, namely gamma effect, of the projector-camera setup introduces phase error in phase-shifting profilometry. This paper presents a comparison of three phase error compensation methods: active, passive and adaptive, using a universal phase error model. The active method calibrates a gamma factor to modify the projected fringe patterns; the passive method implement an iterative procedure to work out an optimal phase map; the adaptive method compensate phase error based on Hilbert transform without any auxiliary conditions. Comparison Experiments were implemented in three and four phase-shifting steps, which demonstrated that the active method provided an excellent performance regardless the phase-shifting step, yet the passive method might fail when the phase error was large; the adaptive method could be in the same level as the passive method in four phase-shifting step.

Paper Details

Date Published: 10 February 2017
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 10250, International Conference on Optical and Photonics Engineering (icOPEN 2016), 102502Z (10 February 2017); doi: 10.1117/12.2267107
Show Author Affiliations
Zewei Cai, Shenzhen Univ. (China)
Xiaoli Liu, Shenzhen Univ. (China)
Qijian Tang, Shenzhen Univ. (China)
Xiang Peng, Shenzhen Univ. (China)
Yongkai Yin, Shandong Univ. (China)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 10250:
International Conference on Optical and Photonics Engineering (icOPEN 2016)
Anand Krishna Asundi; Xiyan Huang; Yi Xie, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top