Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Computational intelligence-based optimization of maximally stable extremal region segmentation for object detection
Author(s): Jeremy E. Davis; Amy E. Bednar; Christopher T. Goodin; Phillip J. Durst; Derek T. Anderson; Cindy L. Bethel
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithms (GAs) are two optimization techniques from the field of computational intelligence (CI) for search problems where a direct solution can not easily be obtained. One such problem is finding an optimal set of parameters for the maximally stable extremal region (MSER) algorithm to detect areas of interest in imagery. Specifically, this paper describes the design of a GA and PSO for optimizing MSER parameters to detect stop signs in imagery produced via simulation for use in an autonomous vehicle navigation system. Several additions to the GA and PSO are required to successfully detect stop signs in simulated images. These additions are a primary focus of this paper and include: the identification of an appropriate fitness function, the creation of a variable mutation operator for the GA, an anytime algorithm modification to allow the GA to compute a solution quickly, the addition of an exponential velocity decay function to the PSO, the addition of an ”execution best” omnipresent particle to the PSO, and the addition of an attractive force component to the PSO velocity update equation. Experimentation was performed with the GA using various combinations of selection, crossover, and mutation operators and experimentation was also performed with the PSO using various combinations of neighborhood topologies, swarm sizes, cognitive influence scalars, and social influence scalars. The results of both the GA and PSO optimized parameter sets are presented. This paper details the benefits and drawbacks of each algorithm in terms of detection accuracy, execution speed, and additions required to generate successful problem specific parameter sets.

Paper Details

Date Published: 2 May 2017
PDF: 16 pages
Proc. SPIE 10200, Signal Processing, Sensor/Information Fusion, and Target Recognition XXVI, 102000V (2 May 2017); doi: 10.1117/12.2262259
Show Author Affiliations
Jeremy E. Davis, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Ctr. (United States)
Amy E. Bednar, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Ctr. (United States)
Christopher T. Goodin, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Ctr. (United States)
Phillip J. Durst, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Ctr. (United States)
Derek T. Anderson, Mississippi State Univ. (United States)
Cindy L. Bethel, Mississippi State Univ. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 10200:
Signal Processing, Sensor/Information Fusion, and Target Recognition XXVI
Ivan Kadar, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top