Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

New methodologies for lower-K1 EUV OPC and RET optimization
Author(s): Kevin Hooker; Aram Kazarian; Xibin Zhou; Josh Tuttle; Guangming Xiao; Yunqiang Zhang; Kevin Lucas
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

EUV lithography is viewed as a highly desirable technology for 5nm and 7nm node patterning cost reduction and process simplicity. However, for the 5nm and 7nm nodes EUV not only needs to function in a low-K1 resolution environment but has several new and complex patterning issues which will need accurate compensation by mask synthesis tools and flows. The main new issues are: long-range flare variation across the chip, feature dependent focus offsets due to high mask topography, asymmetry inducing shadowing effects which vary across the lens slit, significantly higher lens aberrations, illumination source changes (across the lens and with time) and new resist exposure mechanisms. These solutions must be successfully deployed at low K1 values and must be integrated together to create OPC/RET flows which have high resolution, high accuracy, and are fast to deploy. Therefore, the combined requirements of low-K1 resolution, full reticle correction accuracy and process window can be even more challenging than in current optical lithography mask synthesis flows.

Advanced computational methods such as ILT and model-based SRAF optimization are well known to have considerable benefits in process window and resolution for low-K1 193 lithography. However, these methods have not been well studied to understand their benefits for lower-K1 EUV lithography where fabs must push EUV resolution, 2D accuracy and process window to their limits. In this paper, we investigate where inverse lithography methods can improve EUV patterning weaknesses vs. traditional OPC/RET. We first show how ILT can be used to guide a better understanding of optimal solutions for EUV mask synthesis. We then provide detailed comparisons of ILT and traditional methods on a wide range of mask synthesis applications.

Paper Details

Date Published: 24 March 2017
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 10143, Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography VIII, 101431C (24 March 2017); doi: 10.1117/12.2258186
Show Author Affiliations
Kevin Hooker, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)
Aram Kazarian, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)
Xibin Zhou, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)
Josh Tuttle, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)
Guangming Xiao, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)
Yunqiang Zhang, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)
Kevin Lucas, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 10143:
Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography VIII
Eric M. Panning, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top