Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Comparison and use of 3D scanners to improve the quantification of medical images (surface structures and volumes) during follow up of clinical (surgical) procedures
Author(s): Niki Tokkari; Rudolf M. Verdaasdonk; Niels Liberton; Jan Wolff; Martin den Heijer; Albert van der Veen; John H. Klaessens
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

It is difficult to obtain quantitative measurements as to surface areas and volumes from standard photos of the body parts of patients which is highly desirable for objective follow up of treatments in e.g. dermatology. plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. Recently, 3-D scanners have become available to provide quantification.

Phantoms (3-D printed hand, nose and ear, colored bread sculpture) were developed to compare a range from low-cost (Sense), medium (HP Sprout) to high end (Artec Spider, Vectra M3) scanners using different 3D imaging technologies, as to resolution, working range, surface color representation, user friendliness. The 3D scans files (STL, OBJ) were processed with Artec studio and GOM software as to deviation compared to the high resolution Artec Spider scanner taken as ‘golden’ standard. The HP Spout, which uses a fringe projection, proved to be nearly as good as the Artec, however, needs to be converted for clinical use. Photogrammetry as used by the Vectra M3 scanner is limited to provide sufficient data points for accurate surface mapping however provides good color/structure representation. The low performance of the Sense is not recommended for clinical use. The Artec scanner was successfully used to measure the structure/volume changes in the face after hormone treatment in transgender patients.

3D scanners can greatly improve quantitative measurements of surfaces and volumes as objective follow up in clinical studies performed by various clinical specialisms (dermatology, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery). New scanning technologies, like fringe projection, are promising for development of low-cost, high precision scanners.

Paper Details

Date Published: 14 February 2017
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 10054, Advanced Biomedical and Clinical Diagnostic and Surgical Guidance Systems XV, 100540Z (14 February 2017); doi: 10.1117/12.2253241
Show Author Affiliations
Niki Tokkari, VU Univ. Medical Ctr. (Netherlands)
Rudolf M. Verdaasdonk, VU Univ. Medical Ctr. (Netherlands)
Niels Liberton, VU Univ. Medical Ctr. (Netherlands)
Jan Wolff, VU Univ. Medical Ctr. (Netherlands)
Martin den Heijer, VU Univ. Medical Ctr. (Netherlands)
Albert van der Veen, VU Univ. Medical Ctr. (Netherlands)
John H. Klaessens, VU Univ. Medical Ctr. (Netherlands)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 10054:
Advanced Biomedical and Clinical Diagnostic and Surgical Guidance Systems XV
Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Tuan Vo-Dinh; Warren S. Grundfest, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top