Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Comparison of analysis techniques for aerial image metrology on advanced photomask
Author(s): Seolchong Hwang; Sungha Woo; Heeyeon Jang; Youngmo Lee; Sangpyo Kim; Hyunjo Yang; Kristian Schulz; Anthony Garetto
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The standard method for defect disposition and verification of repair success in the mask shop is through the utilization of the aerial imaging platform, AIMSTM. The CD (Critical Dimension) deviation of the defective or repaired region as well as the pattern shift can be calculated by comparing the measured aerial images of this region to that of a reference. Through this analysis it can be determined if the defect or repaired region will be printed on the wafer under the illumination conditions of the scanner. The analysis of the measured aerial images from the AIMSTM are commonly performed manually using the analysis software available on the system or with the help of an analysis software called RV (Repair Verification). Because the process is manual, it is not standardized and is subject to operator variations. This method of manual aerial image analysis is time consuming, dependent on the skill level of the operator and significantly contributes to the overall mask manufacturing process flow. AutoAnalysis (AA), the first application available for the FAVOR® platform, provides fully automated analysis of AIMSTM aerial images [1] and runs in parallel to the measurement of the aerial images. In this paper, we investigate the initial AutoAnalysis performance compared to the conventional method using RV and its application to a production environment. The evaluation is based on the defect CD of three pattern types: contact holes, dense line and spaces and peripheral structure. The defect analysis results for different patterns and illumination conditions will be correlated and challenges in transitioning to the new approach will be discussed.

Paper Details

Date Published: 10 May 2016
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 9984, Photomask Japan 2016: XXIII Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology, 998409 (10 May 2016); doi: 10.1117/12.2240301
Show Author Affiliations
Seolchong Hwang, SK Hynix Inc. (Korea, Republic of)
Sungha Woo, SK Hynix Inc. (Korea, Republic of)
Heeyeon Jang, SK Hynix Inc. (Korea, Republic of)
Youngmo Lee, SK Hynix Inc. (Korea, Republic of)
Sangpyo Kim, SK Hynix Inc. (Korea, Republic of)
Hyunjo Yang, SK Hynix Inc. (Korea, Republic of)
Kristian Schulz, Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH (Germany)
Anthony Garetto, Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH (Germany)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9984:
Photomask Japan 2016: XXIII Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology
Nobuyuki Yoshioka, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top