Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Performance comparison of HEVC reference SW, x265 and VPX on 8-bit 1080p content
Author(s): Pankaj Topiwala; Wei Dai; Madhu Krishnan
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

This paper presents a study comparing the coding efficiency performance of three software codecs: (a) the HEVC Main Profile Reference Software; (b) the x265 codec; and (c) VP10. Note here that we are specifically testing only 8-bit performance. Performance is tabulated for 1-pass encoding on two fronts: (1) objective performance (PSNR), (2) informal subjective assessment. Finally, two approaches to coding were used: (i) constant quality; and (ii) fixed bit rate. Constant quality encoding is performed with all the three codecs for an unbiased comparison of the core coding tools. Whereas target bitrate coding is done to study the compression efficiency achieved with rate control, which can and does have a significant impact. Our general conclusion is that under constant quality coding, the HEVC reference software appears to be superior to the other two, whereas with rate control and fixed rate coding, these codecs are more on an equal footing. We remark that this latter result may be partly or mainly due to the maturity of the various rate control mechanisms in these codecs.

Paper Details

Date Published: 27 September 2016
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 9971, Applications of Digital Image Processing XXXIX, 99711C (27 September 2016); doi: 10.1117/12.2240255
Show Author Affiliations
Pankaj Topiwala, FastVDO LLC (United States)
Wei Dai, FastVDO LLC (United States)
Madhu Krishnan, FastVDO LLC (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9971:
Applications of Digital Image Processing XXXIX
Andrew G. Tescher, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top