Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

A comparison of analytical depth of search metrics with mission simulations for exoplanet imagers
Author(s): Dmitry Savransky; Daniel Garrett; Bruce A. Macintosh
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

While new, advanced, ground-based instrumentation continues to produce new exoplanet discoveries and provide further insights into exoplanet formation and evolution, our desire to discover and characterize planets of Earth size about stars of all types and ages necessitates dedicated, imaging space instruments. Given the high costs and complexities of space observatories, it is vital to build confidence in a proposed instrument’s capabilities during its design phase, and much effort has been devoted to predicting the performance of various flavors of space- based exoplanet imagers. The fundamental problem with trying to answer the question of how many exoplanets a given instrument will discover is that the number of discoverable planets is unknown, and so all results are entirely dependent on the assumptions made about the population of planets being studied. Here, we explore an alternate approach, which involves explicitly separating instrumental and mission biasing from the assumptions made about planet distributions. This allows us to calculate a mission’s ‘depth of search’-a metric independent of the planetary population and defined as the fraction of the contrast–projected separation space reached by a given instrument for a fixed planetary radius and semi-major axis. When multiplied by an assumed occurrence rate for planets at this radius and semi-major axis (derived from an assumed planetary population), this yields the expected number of detections by the instrument for that population. Integrating over the full ranges of semi-major axis and planetary radius provides estimates of planet yield for a full mission. We use this metric to evaluate the coronagraphs under development for the WFIRST mission under different operating assumptions. We also compare the results of convolving the depth of search with an assumed planetary population to those derived by running full mission simulations based on that same population.

Paper Details

Date Published: 29 July 2016
PDF: 14 pages
Proc. SPIE 9904, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, 99041T (29 July 2016); doi: 10.1117/12.2231746
Show Author Affiliations
Dmitry Savransky, Cornell Univ. (United States)
Daniel Garrett, Cornell Univ. (United States)
Bruce A. Macintosh, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (United States)
Stanford Univ. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9904:
Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave
Howard A. MacEwen; Giovanni G. Fazio; Makenzie Lystrup; Natalie Batalha; Nicholas Siegler; Edward C. Tong, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top