Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Comparing performance of standard and iterative linear unmixing methods for hyperspectral signatures
Author(s): Travis R. Gault; Melissa E. Jansen; Mallory E. DeCoster; E. David Jansing; Benjamin M. Rodriguez
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Linear unmixing is a method of decomposing a mixed signature to determine the component materials that are present in sensor’s field of view, along with the abundances at which they occur. Linear unmixing assumes that energy from the materials in the field of view is mixed in a linear fashion across the spectrum of interest. Traditional unmixing methods can take advantage of adjacent pixels in the decomposition algorithm, but is not the case for point sensors. This paper explores several iterative and non-iterative methods for linear unmixing, and examines their effectiveness at identifying the individual signatures that make up simulated single pixel mixed signatures, along with their corresponding abundances. The major hurdle addressed in the proposed method is that no neighboring pixel information is available for the spectral signature of interest. Testing is performed using two collections of spectral signatures from the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory’s Signatures Database software (SigDB): a hand-selected small dataset of 25 distinct signatures from a larger dataset of approximately 1600 pure visible/near-infrared/short-wave-infrared (VIS/NIR/SWIR) spectra. Simulated spectra are created with three and four material mixtures randomly drawn from a dataset originating from SigDB, where the abundance of one material is swept in 10% increments from 10% to 90%with the abundances of the other materials equally divided amongst the remainder. For the smaller dataset of 25 signatures, all combinations of three or four materials are used to create simulated spectra, from which the accuracy of materials returned, as well as the correctness of the abundances, is compared to the inputs. The experiment is expanded to include the signatures from the larger dataset of almost 1600 signatures evaluated using a Monte Carlo scheme with 5000 draws of three or four materials to create the simulated mixed signatures. The spectral similarity of the inputs to the output component signatures is calculated using the spectral angle mapper. Results show that iterative methods significantly outperform the traditional methods under the given test conditions.

Paper Details

Date Published: 17 May 2016
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 9840, Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XXII, 984027 (17 May 2016); doi: 10.1117/12.2224060
Show Author Affiliations
Travis R. Gault, Johns Hopkins Univ. Applied Physics Lab., LLC (United States)
Melissa E. Jansen, Johns Hopkins Univ. Applied Physics Lab., LLC (United States)
Mallory E. DeCoster, Johns Hopkins Univ. Applied Physics Lab., LLC (United States)
E. David Jansing, Johns Hopkins Univ. Applied Physics Lab., LLC (United States)
Benjamin M. Rodriguez, Johns Hopkins Univ. Applied Physics Lab., LLC (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9840:
Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XXII
Miguel Velez-Reyes; David W. Messinger, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top