Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

2.5D dictionary learning based computed tomography reconstruction
Author(s): Jiajia Luo; Haneda Eri; Ali Can; Sathish Ramani; Lin Fu; Bruno De Man
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

A computationally efficient 2.5D dictionary learning (DL) algorithm is proposed and implemented in the model- based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) framework for low-dose CT reconstruction. MBIR is based on the minimization of a cost function containing data-fitting and regularization terms to control the trade-off between data-fidelity and image noise. Due to the strong denoising performance of DL, it has previously been considered as a regularizer in MBIR, and both 2D and 3D DL implementations are possible. Compared to the 2D case, 3D DL keeps more spatial information and generates images with better quality although it requires more computation. We propose a novel 2.5D DL scheme, which leverages the computational advantage of 2D-DL, while attempting to maintain reconstruction quality similar to 3D-DL. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this new 2.5D DL scheme for MBIR in low-dose CT.

By applying the 2D DL method in three different orthogonal planes and calculating the sparse coefficients accordingly, much of the 3D spatial information can be preserved without incurring the computational penalty of the 3D DL method. For performance evaluation, we use baggage phantoms with different number of projection views. In order to quantitatively compare the performance of different algorithms, we use PSNR, SSIM and region based standard deviation to measure the noise level, and use the edge response to calculate the resolution. Experimental results with full view datasets show that the different DL based algorithms have similar performance and 2.5D DL has the best resolution. Results with sparse view datasets show that 2.5D DL outperforms both 2D and 3D DL in terms of noise reduction. We also compare the computational costs, and 2.5D DL shows strong advantage over 3D DL in both full-view and sparse-view cases.

Paper Details

Date Published: 12 May 2016
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 9847, Anomaly Detection and Imaging with X-Rays (ADIX), 98470L (12 May 2016); doi: 10.1117/12.2223786
Show Author Affiliations
Jiajia Luo, GE Global Research Ctr. (United States)
Haneda Eri, GE Global Research Ctr. (United States)
Ali Can, GE Global Research Ctr. (United States)
Sathish Ramani, GE Global Research Ctr. (United States)
Lin Fu, GE Global Research Ctr. (United States)
Bruno De Man, GE Global Research Ctr. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9847:
Anomaly Detection and Imaging with X-Rays (ADIX)
Amit Ashok; Mark A. Neifeld; Michael E. Gehm, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top