Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Quantitative comparison using generalized relative object detectability (G-ROD) metrics of an amorphous selenium detector with high resolution microangiographic fluoroscopes (MAF) and standard flat panel detectors (FPD)
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

A novel amorphous selenium (a-Se) direct detector with CMOS readout has been designed, and relative detector performance investigated. The detector features include a 25μm pixel pitch, and 1000μm thick a-Se layer operating at 10V/μm bias field. A simulated detector DQE was determined, and used in comparative calculations of the Relative Object Detectability (ROD) family of prewhitening matched-filter (PWMF) observer and non-pre-whitening matched filter (NPWMF) observer model metrics to gauge a-Se detector performance against existing high resolution micro-angiographic fluoroscopic (MAF) detectors and a standard flat panel detector (FPD). The PWMF-ROD or ROD metric compares two x-ray imaging detectors in their relative abilities in imaging a given object by taking the integral over spatial frequencies of the Fourier transform of the detector DQE weighted by an object function, divided by the comparable integral for a different detector. The generalized-ROD (G-ROD) metric incorporates clinically relevant parameters (focal- spot size, magnification, and scatter) to show the degradation in imaging performance for detectors that are part of an imaging chain. Preliminary ROD calculations using simulated spheres as the object predicted superior imaging performance by the a-Se detector as compared to existing detectors. New PWMF-G-ROD and NPWMF-G-ROD results still indicate better performance by the a-Se detector in an imaging chain over all sphere sizes for various focal spot sizes and magnifications, although a-Se performance advantages were degraded by focal spot blurring. Nevertheless, the a-Se technology has great potential to provide break- through abilities such as visualization of fine details including of neuro-vascular perforator vessels and of small vascular devices.

Paper Details

Date Published: 22 March 2016
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 9783, Medical Imaging 2016: Physics of Medical Imaging, 97833N (22 March 2016); doi: 10.1117/12.2216733
Show Author Affiliations
M. Russ, Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Ctr. (United States)
Univ. at Buffalo (United States)
A. Shankar, Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Ctr. (United States)
Univ. at Buffalo (United States)
A. Jain, Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Ctr. (United States)
Univ. at Buffalo (United States)
S. V. Setlur Nagesh, Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Ctr. (United States)
Univ. at Buffalo (United States)
C. N. Ionita, Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Ctr. (United States)
Univ. at Buffalo (United States)
C. Scott, Univ. of Waterloo (Canada)
K. S. Karim, Univ. of Waterloo (Canada)
D. R. Bednarek, Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Ctr. (United States)
Univ. at Buffalo (United States)
S. Rudin, Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Ctr. (United States)
Univ. at Buffalo (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9783:
Medical Imaging 2016: Physics of Medical Imaging
Despina Kontos; Thomas G. Flohr, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top