Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Comparison of the influence of CMM measurement strategies on uncertainty evaluation
Author(s): Hongli Li; Xiaohuai Chen; Hongtao Wang; Qiao Yang; Hanbin Wang; Yinbao Cheng
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

In the present application of Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMMs), generally only the estimated value of the measured quantity can be computed while its corresponding measurement uncertainty can not. It is well known that a result without its uncertainty is incomplete. However, uncertainty evaluation has always been one difficult issue in application of CMM because error sources causing measurement uncertainty of CMM are very complex. Based on Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS), the three measurement strategies of CMM application, i.e. conventional measurement, substitution measurement and compensation measurement strategies, are studied in this paper. For each measurement strategy, the uncertainty sources are analyzed, and the corresponding task-oriented uncertainty evaluation model is established. In this paper, the hole diameter measurement of one workpiece is taken as an example. The uncertainty is evaluated respectively according to the three different strategies, and the results are compared. The comparison result shows that the influence of different measurement strategy on measurement result is different, the maximum difference is about 2 times, and the accuracy of measurement can be improved through selecting proper measurement strategy for specific measurement task.

Paper Details

Date Published: 26 January 2016
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 9903, Seventh International Symposium on Precision Mechanical Measurements, 990317 (26 January 2016); doi: 10.1117/12.2211682
Show Author Affiliations
Hongli Li, Hefei Univ. of Technology (China)
Xiaohuai Chen, Hefei Univ. of Technology (China)
Hongtao Wang, Hefei Univ. of Technology (China)
Qiao Yang, China Gas Turbine Establishment (China)
Hanbin Wang, Hefei Univ. of Technology (China)
Yinbao Cheng, Hefei Univ. of Technology (China)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9903:
Seventh International Symposium on Precision Mechanical Measurements
Liandong Yu, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top