Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Absorber topography dependence of phase edge effects
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

Mask topography contributes to phase at the wafer plane, even for OMOG binary masks currently in use at the 22nm node in deep UV (193nm) lithography. Here, numerical experiments with rigorous FDTD simulation are used to study the impact of mask 3D effects on aerial imaging, by varying the height of the absorber stack and its sidewall angle. Using a thin mask boundary layer model to fit to rigorous simulations it is seen that increasing the absorber thickness, and hence the phase through the middle of a feature (bulk phase) monotonically changes the wafer-plane phase. Absorber height also influences best focus, revealed by an up/down shift in the Bossung plot (linewidth vs. defocus). Bossung plot tilt, however, responsible for process window variability at the wafer, is insensitive to changes in the absorber height (and hence also the bulk phase). It is seen to depend instead on EM edge diffraction from the thick mask edge (edge phase), but stays constant for variations in mask thickness within a 10% range. Both bulk phase and edge phase are also independent of sidewall angle fluctuation, which is seen to linearly affect the CD at the wafer, but does not alter wafer phase or the defocus process window. Notably, as mask topography varies, the effect of edge phase can be replicated by a thin mask model with 8nm wide boundary layers, irrespective of absorber height or sidewall angle. The conclusions are validated with measurements on phase shifting masks having different topographic parameters, confirming the strong dependence of phase variations at the wafer on bulk phase of the mask absorber.

Paper Details

Date Published: 9 November 2015
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 9635, Photomask Technology 2015, 96350G (9 November 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2197861
Show Author Affiliations
Aamod Shanker, Univ. of California, Berkeley (United States)
Martin Sczyrba, Advanced Mask Technology Ctr. GmbH Co. KG (Germany)
Brid Connolly, Toppan Photomasks Dresden (Germany)
Laura Waller, Univ. of California, Berkeley (United States)
Andy Neureuther, Univ. of California, Berkeley (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9635:
Photomask Technology 2015
Naoya Hayashi, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top