Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

MPC model validation using reverse analysis method
Author(s): Sukho Lee; So-Eun Shin; Jungwook Shon; Jisoong Park; Inkyun Shin; Chan-Uk Jeon
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

It became more challenging to guarantee the overall mask Critical Dimension (CD) quality according to the increase of hot spots and assist features at leading edge devices. Therefore, mask CD correction methodology has been changing from the rule-based (and/or selective) correction to model-based MPC (Mask Process Correction) to compensate for the through-pitch linearity and hot spot CD errors.

In order to improve mask quality, it is required to have accurate MPC model which properly describes current mask fabrication process. There are limits on making and defining accurate MPC model because it is hard to know the actual CD trend such as CD linearity and through-pitch owing to the process dispersion and measurement error. To mitigate such noises, we normally measure several sites of each pattern types and then utilize the mean value of each measurement for MPC modeling. Through those procedures, the noise level of mask data will be reduced but it does not always guarantee improvement of model accuracy, even though measurement overhead is increasing. Root mean square (RMS) values which is usually used for accuracy indicator after modeling actually does not give any information on accuracy of MPC model since it is only related with data noise dispersion.

In this paper, we reversely approached to identify the model accuracy. We create the data regarded as actual CD trend and then create scattered data by adding controlled dispersion of denoting the process and measurement error to the data. Then we make MPC model based on the scattered data to examine how much the model is deviated from the actual CD trend, from which model accuracy can be investigated. It is believed that we can come up with appropriate method to define the reliability of MPC model developed for optimized process corrections.

Paper Details

Date Published: 23 October 2015
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 9635, Photomask Technology 2015, 96350V (23 October 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2197162
Show Author Affiliations
Sukho Lee, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
So-Eun Shin, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Jungwook Shon, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Jisoong Park, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Inkyun Shin, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Chan-Uk Jeon, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9635:
Photomask Technology 2015
Naoya Hayashi, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top