Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

The shower curtain effect paradoxes
Author(s): Gregoire Tremblay; Robert Bernier; Gilles Roy
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

It is generally admitted that the relative location of an aerosol between an observation device and the observed scene will have an influence on the detected image quality. These effects are usually classified under the label “shower curtain effect” (SCE). The usual formulation describing it is as follows: an observer standing away from a shower curtain can detect the presence of a person standing just behind it whereas the opposite is not true. Starting from a discussion of experimental results which seemed to invalidate the SCE, we show that it is not the only mechanism at work and that thorough analysis of the measurement setup is required before reaching such conclusion. We base our discussion on four cases, two of them of the passive detection type, the two others being of the active type. We also show that the ratio of scattered to unscattered light at the detector is of utmost importance. We show this by further developing our model [10] of the point spread function (PSF) of the receiver. This model allows the discussion of the SCE in the frequency domain in terms of the cuton and cutoff frequencies of the receiver. In the end, we show that the apparent paradoxical results we had found cannot actually be placed under the “shower curtain effect” denomination because: 1-) the amount of unscattered light captured is higher than the amount of scattered light, and 2-) the receiver cuton frequency is much higher than the aerosol cutoff frequency rendering most mechanisms of the shower curtain effect ineffective.

Paper Details

Date Published: 8 October 2015
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 9641, Optics in Atmospheric Propagation and Adaptive Systems XVIII, 964107 (8 October 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2194837
Show Author Affiliations
Gregoire Tremblay, AEREX Avionique Inc. (Canada)
Robert Bernier, Les Instruments Optiques du St-Laurent Inc. (Canada)
Gilles Roy, Defence Research and Development Canada (Canada)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9641:
Optics in Atmospheric Propagation and Adaptive Systems XVIII
Karin U. Stein; John D. Gonglewski, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top