Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

The limitations of using M-squared for input beam characterization in simulation software
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The M-squared (M2) parameter for defining laser beam quality is a convenient metric to characterize the variation of the beam size and far field divergence of a “real” propagated optical beam, compared with that of an ideal Gaussian beam of the same wavelength. However, it can be problematic to use this parameter solely to characterize an input beam for propagation simulation software. Similar to RMS wavefront error or Strehl ratio, which can be used to define image quality, but do not characterize the shape of the wavefront, different factors can result in beams with identical M2 values, but very different propagation behavior. Beams that differ due to aberrations, non-Gaussian amplitude envelopes, and/or partial spatial coherence may have similar or identical M2 values, but very different far-field and/or near-field intensity and/or phase distributions. The situation is complicated further if the beam encounters non-ideal optics. In this paper, we investigate a number of beams that all have (approximately) the same M2. While M2 is invariant for propagation through an ideal optical system, we show that when an optical system introduces aberrations, it can alter different beams with the same, non-unity M2 in ways that differ significantly from one beam to another.

Paper Details

Date Published: 23 September 2015
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 9626, Optical Systems Design 2015: Optical Design and Engineering VI, 96260K (23 September 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2191362
Show Author Affiliations
David M. Hasenauer, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)
Bryan D. Stone, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9626:
Optical Systems Design 2015: Optical Design and Engineering VI
Laurent Mazuray; Rolf Wartmann; Andrew P. Wood, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top