Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Are there photons in fact?
Author(s): S. A. Rashkovskiy
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

There are two opposing points of view on the nature of light: the first one manifests the wave-particle duality as a fundamental property of the nature; the second one claims that photons do not exist and the light is a continuous classical wave, while the so-called “quantum” properties of this field appear only as a result of its interaction with matter. In this paper we show that many quantum phenomena which are traditionally described by quantum electrodynamics can be described if light is considered within the limits of classical electrodynamics without quantization of radiation. These phenomena include the double-slit experiment, the photoelectric effect, the Compton effect, the Hanbury Brown and Twiss effect, the so-called multiphoton ionisation of atoms, etc. We show that this point of view allows also explaining the “wave-particle duality” of light in Wiener experiments with standing waves. We show that the Born rule for light can easily be derived from Fermi’s golden rule as an approximation for low-intense light or for short exposure time. We show that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for “photons” has a simple classical sense and cannot be considered as a fundamental limitation of accuracy of simultaneous measurements of position and momentum or time and energy. We conclude that the concept of a “photon” is superfluous in explanation of light-matter interactions.

Paper Details

Date Published: 10 September 2015
PDF: 13 pages
Proc. SPIE 9570, The Nature of Light: What are Photons? VI, 95700G (10 September 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2185010
Show Author Affiliations
S. A. Rashkovskiy, Institute for Problems in Mechanics (Russian Federation)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9570:
The Nature of Light: What are Photons? VI
Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri; Al F. Kracklauer; Hans De Raedt, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top