Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Relative merits of using maximum error versus 3(sigma) in describing the performance of laser-exposure reticle writing systems
Author(s): Henry Chris Hamaker
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Various techniques for estimating the performance of laser reticle writing systems are examined and compared. The criterion used to measure performance is based on finding the effective maximum error Em, which is defined as the value for which 99.73% of the error population falls within the limits +/- Em. The commonly used technique of using 3(sigma) , where (sigma) is the standard deviation, is shown to be a poor estimate when statistical analyses based on the normal distribution do not describe the data well. Improved accuracy is obtained when corrections based on the skewness (gamma) 1 and the coefficient of excess flatness (gamma) 2 are included. For system qualification, direct observation of the maximum error among a set of approximately 256 samples of the error is the preferred technique. When the sample size differs significantly from this value, the use of corrections based on (gamma) 1 and (gamma) 2 to determine the maximum error is preferred over alternative methods due to its emphasis on the behavior in the tails of the distribution.

Paper Details

Date Published: 26 May 1995
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 2440, Optical/Laser Microlithography VIII, (26 May 1995); doi: 10.1117/12.209285
Show Author Affiliations
Henry Chris Hamaker, Etec Systems, Inc. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2440:
Optical/Laser Microlithography VIII
Timothy A. Brunner, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top