Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Influence of DBT reconstruction algorithm on power law spectrum coefficient
Author(s): Laurence Vancamberg; Ann-Katherine Carton; Ilyes Hadj Abderrahmane; Giovanni Palma; Pablo Milioni de Carvalho; Răzvan Iordache; Serge Muller
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

In breast X-ray images, texture has been characterized by a noise power spectrum (NPS) that has an inverse power-law shape described by its slope β in the log-log domain. It has been suggested that the magnitude of the power-law spectrum coefficient β is related to mass lesion detection performance. We assessed β in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images to evaluate its sensitivity to different typical reconstruction algorithms including simple back projection (SBP), filtered back projection (FBP) and a simultaneous iterative reconstruction algorithm (SIRT 30 iterations). Results were further compared to the β coefficient estimated from 2D central DBT projections. The calculations were performed on 31 unilateral clinical DBT data sets and simulated DBT images from 31 anthropomorphic software breast phantoms. Our results show that β highly depends on the reconstruction algorithm; the highest β values were found for SBP, followed by reconstruction with FBP, while the lowest β values were found for SIRT. In contrast to previous studies, we found that β is not always lower in reconstructed DBT slices, compared to 2D projections and this depends on the reconstruction algorithm. All β values estimated in DBT slices reconstructed with SBP were larger than β values from 2D central projections. Our study also shows that the reconstruction algorithm affects the symmetry of the breast texture NPS; the NPS of clinical cases reconstructed with SBP exhibit the highest symmetry, while the NPS of cases reconstructed with SIRT exhibit the highest asymmetry.

Paper Details

Date Published: 18 March 2015
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 9412, Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical Imaging, 941236 (18 March 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2081969
Show Author Affiliations
Laurence Vancamberg, GE Healthcare (France)
Ann-Katherine Carton, GE Healthcare (France)
Ilyes Hadj Abderrahmane, GE Healthcare (France)
Giovanni Palma, GE Healthcare (France)
Pablo Milioni de Carvalho, GE Healthcare (France)
Răzvan Iordache, GE Healthcare (France)
Serge Muller, GE Healthcare (France)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9412:
Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical Imaging
Christoph Hoeschen; Despina Kontos, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top