Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Comparison of EMCCD post-processing methods for photon counting flux ranges
Author(s): Nassim Rousset; Jérémie Villeneuve; Jean-Hughes Fournier-Lupien; Anis Attiaoui; Gabriel Taillon; Sébastien Francoeur; Olivier Daigle
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

Several post-processing methods were proposed to overcome the excess noise factor induced by EMCCD multiplication register. Each method has a unique effect on SNR. However, since SNR does not account for photometric accuracy, it cannot be reliably used to directly compare the performance of these algorithms. A normalized quadratic error that accounts for both SNR and accuracy is proposed as an alternative figure of merit. This approach provides a quantitative and rigorous comparison. Using both experimental and simulated frames in the faint-flux range, it is used to compare the existing EMCCD post-processing methods.

Paper Details

Date Published: 23 July 2014
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 9154, High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy VI, 91540F (23 July 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2055350
Show Author Affiliations
Nassim Rousset, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal (Canada)
Jérémie Villeneuve, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal (Canada)
Jean-Hughes Fournier-Lupien, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal (Canada)
Anis Attiaoui, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal (Canada)
Gabriel Taillon, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal (Canada)
Sébastien Francoeur, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal (Canada)
Olivier Daigle, Nüvü Caméras Inc. (Canada)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9154:
High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy VI
Andrew D. Holland; James Beletic, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top