Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Passive detection, characterization, and localization of multiple LFMCW LPI signals
Author(s): Brandon Hamschin; John Clancy; Mike Grabbe; Matthew Fortier; John Novak
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

A method for passive Detection, Characterization, and Localization (DCL) of multiple low power, Linear Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (LFMCW) (i.e., Low Probability of Intercept (LPI)) signals is proposed. In contrast to other detection and characterization approaches, such as those based on the Wigner-Ville Transform (WVT) 1or the Wigner-Ville Hough Transform (WVHT) ,2 our approach does not begin with a parametric model of the received signal that is specified directly in terms of its LFMCW constituents. Rather, we analyze the signal over time intervals that are short, non-overlapping, and contiguous by modeling it within these intervals as a sum of sinusoidal (i.e., harmonic) components with unknown frequencies, deterministic but unknown amplitudes, unknown order (i.e., number of harmonic components), and unknown noise autocorrelation function. Using this model of the signal, which we refer to as the Short-Time Harmonic Model (STHM), we implement a detection statistic based on Thompson's Method for harmonic analysis,3 which leads to a detection threshold that is a function of False Alarm Probability PFA and not a function of the noise properties. By doing so we reliably detect the presence of multiple LFMCW signals in colored noise without the need for prewhitening, efficiently estimate (i.e., characterize) their parameters, provide estimation error variances for a subset of these parameters, and produce Time-of-Arrival (TOA) estimates that can be used to estimate the geographical location of (i.e., localize) each LFMCW source. Finally, by using the entire time-series we refine these parameter estimates by using them as initial conditions to the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE), which was originally given in1 and later found in2 to be too computationally expensive for multiple LFMCW signals if accurate initial conditions were not available to limit the search space. We demonstrate the performance of our approach via simulation.

Paper Details

Date Published: 13 June 2014
PDF: 28 pages
Proc. SPIE 9090, Automatic Target Recognition XXIV, 909008 (13 June 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2054331
Show Author Affiliations
Brandon Hamschin, The Johns Hopkins Univ. Applied Physics Lab. (United States)
John Clancy, The Johns Hopkins Univ. Applied Physics Lab. (United States)
Mike Grabbe, The Johns Hopkins Univ. Applied Physics Lab. (United States)
Matthew Fortier, The Johns Hopkins Univ. Applied Physics Lab. (United States)
John Novak, ASD Space and Sensor Systems (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9090:
Automatic Target Recognition XXIV
Firooz A. Sadjadi; Abhijit Mahalanobis, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top