Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Influence of image registration on ADC images computed from free-breathing diffusion MRIs of the abdomen
Author(s): Jean-Marie Guyader; Livia Bernardin; Naomi H. M. Douglas; Dirk H. J. Poot; Wiro J. Niessen; Stefan Klein
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is an imaging biomarker providing quantitative information on the diffusion of water in biological tissues. This measurement could be of relevance in oncology drug development, but it suffers from a lack of reliability. ADC images are computed by applying a voxelwise exponential fitting to multiple diffusion-weighted MR images (DW-MRIs) acquired with different diffusion gradients. In the abdomen, respiratory motion induces misalignments in the datasets, creating visible artefacts and inducing errors in the ADC maps. We propose a multistep post-acquisition motion compensation pipeline based on 3D non-rigid registrations. It corrects for motion within each image and brings all DW-MRIs to a common image space. The method is evaluated on 10 datasets of free-breathing abdominal DW-MRIs acquired from healthy volunteers. Regions of interest (ROIs) are segmented in the right part of the abdomen and measurements are compared in the three following cases: no image processing, Gaussian blurring of the raw DW-MRIs and registration. Results show that both blurring and registration improve the visual quality of ADC images, but compared to blurring, registration yields visually sharper images. Measurement uncertainty is reduced both by registration and blurring. For homogeneous ROIs, blurring and registration result in similar median ADCs, which are lower than without processing. In a ROI at the interface between liver and kidney, registration and blurring yield different median ADCs, suggesting that uncorrected motion introduces a bias. Our work indicates that averaging procedures on the scanner should be avoided, as they remove the opportunity to perform motion correction.

Paper Details

Date Published: 21 March 2014
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 9034, Medical Imaging 2014: Image Processing, 90340O (21 March 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2043174
Show Author Affiliations
Jean-Marie Guyader, Erasmus MC (Netherlands)
Livia Bernardin, The Institute of Cancer Research (United Kingdom)
Royal Marsden Hospital (United Kingdom)
Naomi H. M. Douglas, The Institute of Cancer Research (United Kingdom)
Royal Marsden Hospital (United Kingdom)
Dirk H. J. Poot, Erasmus MC (Netherlands)
Wiro J. Niessen, Erasmus MC (Netherlands)
Technische Univ. Delft (Netherlands)
Stefan Klein, Erasmus MC (Netherlands)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9034:
Medical Imaging 2014: Image Processing
Sebastien Ourselin; Martin A. Styner, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top