Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Remote sensing methods to monitor habitats potentially threatened by climate change
Author(s): Michael Förster; Tobias Schmidt; Nadine Spindler; Kathrin Renner; Iris Wagner-Lücker; Marc Zebisch; Marco Neubert
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The recognition and monitoring of vegetation and habitats for nature conservation is a vital point of research within the remote sensing community. It has been agreed on that there is no general solution on deriving information on habitats due to different data availability and spectral as well as textural behaviour of habitat main types (e.g. woodlands, grasslands, etc.). Therefore the monitoring should be rather multi-scale, versatile, user-friendly, and cost-efficient for predefined indicators. In the presented study, five Central European test sites of natural vegetation communities in an Alpine area (1), a temperate forest (2), a Pannonian grassland (3), a shallow lake (4) and a Carpathian grassland (5) have been investigated by multi-temporal remote sensing. For these studies, different time-series of RapidEye images from the years 2009 to 2011 were acquired. The amount of the images was depending on required acquisitions dates as well as weather conditions. The definition of the indicators was relying on the available ground truth data as well as the demands and judgement of the managing authorities in the nature conservation areas. The selected methods for deriving of the indicators depend on the time-series as well as the available calibration and validation data. The techniques vary between unsupervised classification, object-based approaches and supervised classification methods with algorithms such as support vector machines (e.g. SVM) or classification trees (e.g. See5). Often the named methods are utilized in combined approaches. The resulting indicators for the monitoring are shrub encroachment (for 1), share of naturally occurring tree type (for 2), differentiation of grassland types (for 3 and 5) and the changing extent of a reed belt (for 4). All indicators seem to be valid and useful. However, a transferability of the methods or a general statement on good-practice remote sensing applications can hardly be derived from these specific case studies.

Paper Details

Date Published: 24 October 2013
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 8893, Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications IV, 88930L (24 October 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2029354
Show Author Affiliations
Michael Förster, Technische Univ. Berlin (Germany)
Tobias Schmidt, Technische Univ. Berlin (Germany)
Nadine Spindler, EURAC research (Italy)
Kathrin Renner, EURAC research (Italy)
Iris Wagner-Lücker, Univ. Wien (Austria)
Marc Zebisch, EURAC research (Italy)
Marco Neubert, Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (Germany)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8893:
Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications IV
Ulrich Michel; Daniel L. Civco; Karsten Schulz; Manfred Ehlers; Konstantinos G. Nikolakopoulos, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top