Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Sensitivity analysis for OMOG and EUV photomasks characterized by UV-NIR spectroscopic ellipsometry
Author(s): A. Heinrich; I. Dirnstorfer; J. Bischoff; K. Meiner; U. Richter; T. Mikolajick
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

We investigated the potentials, applicability and advantages of spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) for the characterization of high-end photomasks. The SE measurements were done in the ultraviolet-near infrared (UVNIR) wavelength range from 300 nm to 980 nm, at angle of incidences (AOI) between 10 and 70° and with a microspot size of 45 x 10 μm2 (AOI=70°). The measured Ψ and 𝛥 spectra were modeled using the rigorous coupled wave analysis (RCWA) to determine the structural parameters of a periodic array, i.e. the pitch and critical dimension (CD). Two different types of industrial photomasks consisting of line/space structures were evaluated, the reflecting extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and the transmitting opaque MoSi on glass (OMOG) mask. The Ψ and 𝛥 spectra of both masks show characteristic differences, which were related to the Rayleigh singularities and the missing transmission diffraction in the EUV mask. In the second part of the paper, a simulation based sensitivity analysis of the Fourier coefficients α and β is presented, which is used to define the required measurement precision to detect a CD deviation of 1%. This study was done for both mask types to investigate the influence of the stack transmission. It was found that sensitivities to CD variations are comparable for OMOG and EUV masks. For both masks, the highest sensitivities appear close to the Rayleigh singularities and significantly increase at very low AOI. To detect a 1% CD deviation for pitches below 150 nm a measurement precision in the order of 0.01 is required. This measurement precision can be realized with advanced optical hardware. It is concluded that UV-NIR ellipsometry is qualified to characterize photomasks down to the 13 nm technology node in 2020.

Paper Details

Date Published: 9 September 2013
PDF: 13 pages
Proc. SPIE 8880, Photomask Technology 2013, 88801V (9 September 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2026157
Show Author Affiliations
A. Heinrich, NaMLab gGmbH (Germany)
I. Dirnstorfer, NaMLab gGmbH (Germany)
J. Bischoff, Osires (Germany)
K. Meiner, Sentech Instruments GmbH (Germany)
U. Richter, Sentech Instruments GmbH (Germany)
T. Mikolajick, NaMLab gGmbH (Germany)
Technische Univ. Dresden (Germany)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8880:
Photomask Technology 2013
Thomas B. Faure; Paul W. Ackmann, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top