Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Benchmarking study of 3D mask modeling for 2X and 1X nodes
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

With ever shrinking critical dimensions, half nm OPC errors are a primary focus for process improvement in computational lithography. Among many error sources for 2x and 1x nodes, 3D mask modeling has caught the attention of engineers and scientists as a method to reduce errors at these nodes. While the benefits of 3D mask modeling are well known, there will be a runtime penalty of 30-40% that needs to be weighed against the benefit of optical model accuracy improvements. The economically beneficial node to adopt 3D mask modeling has to be determined by balancing these factors. In this paper, a benchmarking study has been conducted on a 20nm cut mask, metal and via layers with two different computational lithography approaches as compared with standard thin-mask approximation modeling. Besides basic RMS error metrics for model calibration and verification, through pitch and through size optical proximity behavior, through focus model predictability, best focus prediction and common DOF prediction are thoroughly evaluated. Runtime impact and OPC accuracy are also studied.

Paper Details

Date Published: 12 April 2013
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 8683, Optical Microlithography XXVI, 86831A (12 April 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2011485
Show Author Affiliations
ChangAn Wang, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (United States)
Chao-Chun Liang, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (United States)
Huikan Liu, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (United States)
Chidam Kallingal, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (United States)
Derren Dunn, IBM Corp. (United States)
James Oberschmidt, IBM Corp. (United States)
Jaione Tirapu Azpiroz, IBM Corp. (Brazil)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8683:
Optical Microlithography XXVI
Will Conley, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top